For a world free of hazardous chemicals

A catalyst for change

ChemSec - bridging the gap between regulators, business, investors, NGOs and science

Read more...

ChemSec transparency lawsuit against ECHA ends in stalemate

ChemSec transparency lawsuit against ECHA ends in stalemate

EU court rules ChemSec was right asking for the names of the chemical manufacturers that produce SIN-list chemicals, but not the...

Read more...

ChemSec launch the Textile Guide

ChemSec launch the Textile Guide - A new tool to tackle chemicals in textiles

Up until now brand owners and other companies in the textile sector had to invest a lot of money in chemical expertise in order to produce toxic...

Read more...

A well-functioning authorisation process drives innovation

The authorisation process

Find the latest updates for ChemSec's authorisation work

Read more...

SINimilarity gets an extensive update

Free of charge chemistry tool empowers non-chemists

Non-profit ChemSec today reveals the updated SINimilarity tool.

The tool gives non-experts vital chemical...

Read more...

What´s your chemical footprint?

What´s your chemical footprint?

Nowadays it's common business practice to know and publish the corporate carbon footprint. And the "What you measure – you can manage" approach...

Read more...

MEPs urge European Commission to act on SIN List endocrine disruptors

At a European Parliament Environment Committee (ENVI) meeting last week, many MEPs called on the European Commission "for a bigger sense of urgency" to speed up its work on endocrine disrupting chemicals as well as the cocktail effects of chemicals.

Chemical Watch writes that European Commission DG Environment's Patrick Murphy; "fielded a barrage of questions from ENVI members, who wanted to know why the Commission was not doing more to ban endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), in particular the 22 substances identified on the last SIN List drawn up by the NGO ChemSec earlier this year."

Swedish Green MEP Carl Schlyter, described EDCs as one of the most underestimated environmental threats to human kind today, and stated that it is very surprising that these substances are intentionally added to products we put on our skin, and in food contact materials etc. "We have had a strategy for twelve years, where is the action?" Schlyter, on the basis of describing the methodology behind the SIN List 2.0, urged the Commission to prepare dossiers for candidate list inclusion on the 22 EDCs recently added to the SIN list, which would be "excellent" for inclusion on the candidate list.

 

Patrick Murphy described the Commission's planned actions on EDCs, and insisted on the complexity of these issues. Regarding the SIN List, he said that it is a very useful basis for discussion, and the European Commission will "look at it seriously", but could not promise any concrete action of preparing candidate list dossiers.

ENVI committee chairwoman, Corinne Lepage, closed the debate by stating that she was not happy with the answers provided by the Commission, and said that asking the Commission to act on EDCs is like "pushing against a rock, but not getting anywhere".

Watch the entire ENVI debate online

Chemical Watch article