First of all, let’s make one thing clear: self-regulation does not work. The ongoing PFAS crisis is proof that stronger measures are needed. Authorities must have the power to regulate the most harmful substances and at the same time ensure that companies are rewarded for their responsible practices — and here’s how that should be done.
What you’re about to read would not only streamline and simplify the REACH regulation. It would also see the EU maintain its leadership position, securing a level playing field, competitiveness and a circular economy while increasing health and environmental protection. Oh, and it would simultaneously reduce public costs.
Sounds too good to be true? Well, it isn’t. In fact, we wrote to EU President Ursula von der Leyen in December with an outline proposal for how this can be done. Now, we’ve gone the extra mile and produced a detailed, 15-page policy document to put flesh on the bones.
Listen to the podcast version! 👇👇
FYI, this is AI-generated content.
Here are three key takeaways:
Simple and effective regulatory tools to phase out the most harmful substances and reduce the administrative burden. Ambitious and clear aims, targets, and phase-out dates in the regulation will provide predictability, drive substitution and support an innovative industry in Europe.
Sunset dates for SVHCs and streamlined implementation of the Authorisation system will see non-essential uses phased out much faster. And GRA restrictions extended to all most harmful substances in mixtures and articles intended for the general public and professional users need to be fast-tracked. Implementation should occur gradually over a 10-year period.
Improved assessment of alternatives will unlock the market for safer alternatives. Ensure fair competition and an innovative EU industry fit for the future by actively searching for alternatives and creating a safe space for alternative providers.
Increased transparency on chemicals and uses: Broaden registration requirements for all most harmful substances and, as a minimum, high-risk polymers. This will make it simpler for companies to start early substitution and for authorities to prioritise substances and uses for regulatory action.
